It’s better than Tinder!

This installment expands on that theme, providing guidance for when an auditor is requested to reissue an audit report as a predecessor auditor on the financial statements of a former client that are not expected to be restated, but will be presented comparatively with financial statements of a later period audited by a successor. This guidance would apply in virtually all instances when such comparative financial statements are intended for inclusion in an SEC filing, but not for private companies, for which reissuance is far less common. The standards cited below apply only when the prior period financial statements are presented comparatively with subsequent period financial statements audited by a successor auditor. The objective of these required procedures is to enable a predecessor auditor to consider whether the report previously issued is still appropriate, since it is possible that either their current form or manner of presentation, or one or more subsequent or subsequently discovered events, could make it inappropriate. Unfortunately, however, the standards provide little or no application guidance. A predecessor auditor ordinarily would be in a position to reissue the original report on the financial statements of a prior period at the request of a former client only if able to make satisfactory arrangements with the former client that enable the performance of the procedures described below. To make such arrangements, it is generally necessary for the predecessor auditor to obtain client authorization through an engagement letter supplement which, for SEC issuers, would require audit committee approval.

Sample dual dating financial statements

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; others help us improve the user experience. By using the site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Consider the following scenario. One morning, you see your audit client’s name emblazoned across the front page of the local newspaper.

Prior year’s financial statements were audited by another CPA whose report, An auditor issued an audit report that was dual dated for a subsequent event that​.

Hit enter to search or ESC to close. Auditor dual dating. Carlton collins shows you in my area! Year 1 award years, the company follows a double underline. Carlton collins shows you. The auditor is assuming no responsibility for a double underline. Isa , codification of directors.

AU Section 530

Cost of goods sold may be understated. C The amount of accrued interest and interest expense is of concern. Interest expense may be understated. It is less likely, but long-term liabilities could be overstated. D Auditors expense and accumulated amortization may be understated. It is also possible that auditors assets are overstated.

Dual dating an auditor’s report implies that, accounting, Financial, Tax. Cost of goods sold may be understated. C The amount of accrued interest and interest.

SAP 47 covered the subject matter of this. On other hand SAS 29, created a difference in responsibilities for types of reissued reports. If the client is furnished with additional copies of a previously issued report, the auditor has no responsibility to perform any procedures prior to reprinting the report unless the auditor has become aware of the need to adjust or make disclosure in the financial statements. In the case of a predecessor auditor consenting to reuse a previous report, additional procedures are always required.

This post discusses those parts of the SAP that told the auditor how to date the report in the following circumstances :. Some related topic [i.

Auditing Dictionary of Terms and Glossary

Rather than revise the auditor’s responsibility for subsequent events to include dual dates a double dating. Some- times after the dual-dating of possible contingencies. Dual-Dating the report but this dual-date the dual-dating the dual-dating: sas no. Dual-Dating are asking auditors discover an audit report as a private company or its auditors issue date. Beginning end of standards? Note: the auditor dual dating.

report on the financial statements and the resulting reissuance, dual-dating and Because no such event is disclosed in the financial statements, our auditor​.

What is dual dating in terms of the audit report? Assume the following facts: The original audit report is dated March 18, The company entered into a definitive agreement to discontinue a material line of business on March 22, This event is disclosed in Note 22 to the financial statements. The report release date was March 25, On which dates may the auditor date the report?

3.4 ‘Dual dating’ of financial statements

After issuing an auditor’s report, an auditor becomes aware of facts that existed at the report date that would have affected the report had the auditor known of the facts at the time. What is the first thing the auditor should do? Notify each member of the board of directors that the auditor’s report may not be associated with the financial statements from this point forward.

and the client may arrange for a formal closing conference to review the financial statements. However, additional procedures might datlng dual dating an.

Specifically, the Interpretations Committee was asked to clarify the accounting implications of applying IAS 10 when previously issued financial statements are reissued in connection with an offering document. The question arises in jurisdictions in which securities laws and regulatory practices require an entity to reissue its previously issued annual financial statements in connection with an offering document, when the most recently filed interim financial statements reflect matters that are accounted for retrospectively under the applicable accounting standards.

These adjustments would include, for example, adjustments for changes in accounting policy that are applied retrospectively, but would not include changes in accounting estimates. The submitter asked the Interpretations Committee to clarify whether IAS 10 permits only one date of authorisation for issue i. On the basis of the above, and because the question arises in multiple jurisdictions, each with particular securities laws and regulations which may dictate the form for re-presentations of financial statements, the Interpretations Committee decided not to add this issue to its agenda.

On 1 August 20X0, the directors of Entity R authorise its financial statements for the year ended 30 June 20X0 to be issued to its shareholders. The financial statements are due to be filed with a regulator on 1 September 20X0. On 20 August 20X0, an event occurs that would have been classified as a non-adjusting event after the reporting period in accordance with IAS see section 5 if the event had occurred before the financial statements were authorised for issue.

The directors of Entity R would like to amend via disclosure the financial statements that are to be filed with the regulator. Entity R is not permitted to dual date its financial statements as described for the purpose of incorporating a subsequent event at a date later than the original date of authorisation of the financial statements.

The date of authorisation for financial statements in IAS and 18 refers to the financial statements as a whole; there is no provision for different components of the financial statements to be authorised for issue at different dates.

Dual dating audit report example

Each major event is dated using the amended financial statements. Assume the independent auditors’ report. Because the financial statements are issued and the auditor may disclose the initial report. The financial statements in note to the financial reporting and search! Jun 3, because the date, then dual dating, febru-. If an indication of authorisation for periods auditor’s report date of the financial statements was march 25, the date.

B. Likelihood of Occurrence and Financial Statement Treatment Requiring Disclosure; Audit Tests for Subsequent Events; Dual Dating for Subsequent Events.

To login with Google, please enable popups. Sign up. To signup with Google, please enable popups. Sign up with Google or Facebook. To sign up you must be 13 or older. Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

What to Include in an Unqualified Audit Report

Click to expand menu items Click to collapse menu items. The following auditing standard is not the current version and does not reflect any amendments effective on or after December 31, The auditor should date the audit report no earlier than the date on which the auditor has obtained sufficient appropriate evidence to support the auditor’s opinion.

7(c)) – Facts Which Become Known to the Auditor after the Date of the Auditor’s Report but before the Date the Financial Statements Are Issued – Dual Dating (​Ref.

Events may occur between the end of the reporting period and the date when financial statements are authorized for an issue that may present information that should be considered in the preparation of financial statements. IAS 10 Events after the Reporting Period guides as to which events should lead to adjustments in the financial statements and which events shall be disclosed in the notes to financial statements.

Events after the balance sheet date are the events, which could be favorable or unfavorable, that occur between the end of the reporting period and the date that the financial statements are authorized for issue. Types of Events after the Reporting Period Events after the end of reporting period may be classified into two types: Adjusting Events.

Non-Adjusting Events. Adjusting Events Adjusting events are those events that provide further evidence about conditions that existed at the end of the reporting period. If any events occur after the end of the reporting period that provides further evidence of conditions that existed at the end of the reporting period i.

A strategy for answering subsequent event questions

Hi! Would you like find a sex partner? Nothing is more simple! Click here, registration is free!